--
Monday, July 18, 2016
Sunday, July 17, 2016
Fwd: Fw: Fwd: FW: Boombox
| |
Friday, July 1, 2016
Lt Col Fred Dibella
For two years as a senior combat trainer (observer/controller) at the National Training Center and another two as the G3 of the 1st Armored Division in Germany, I was fortunate enough to be responsible for their training as around 50 Armor and Infantry branch Lieutenant Colonels lead their battalions through the most rigorous, realistic large unit training the US Army has ever offered. I conducted the formal after action review for every battle and so was very familiar with what took place and why. If the "battles" we fought had taken place with real ammo instead of lasers, artillery simulators, and subjective mine field and air attack assessments, every single one of those battalion commanders would have lost (dead, wounded, captured or destroyed) the equivalent of at least three complete battalions worth of men and equipment over the space of just two weeks. Every single one, that is except Fred Dibella.
At the National Training Center, Fred's battalion soundly defeated the best "Soviet Armored Regiment" that ever strapped on tanker boots in 5 consecutive battles! And it was not even close! Lt Col Dibella understood tactical warfare and how to prepare his leaders and their men before they ever arrived on the battlefield. They came to the NTC with a mutual understanding of how every single piece of the task force affected every other piece and they understood that every leader's battle plan must support the plan of the entire task force. The manner in which Lt Col Dibella had prepared and trained his leaders and soldiers before the first shot was ever fired was the best I have ever seen. The manner in which they actually fought the NTC battles was unequaled!
My entire experience with Lt Col Fred Dibella was over the course of those two weeks. But I can tell you that he knew more about how to fight and how to train his people to fight than any other battalion commander I had the opportunity to help train. So pay attention to what he writes in the article that follows. Mac Johnson
In a 2015 memo by the Secretary of the Army to worldwide Army Commands, the Secretary dictated that 'Commanders and soldiers will balance lactation support and readiness.'
In response, COL (Ret) Fred Dibella, USMA Class of '69 and former TAC of Company F2 at West Point wrote: "Ok, I've had all I can stomach. I'm done. Scroll down and read this crap right now, if you think I'm kidding, then come back to my remarks, if you haven't puked your guts out. (USMA '69 forum, feel free to permanently ban me from your rolls, but I've had enough.)
Obama and his lackeys have now systematically laid the groundwork to accomplish what no battlefield enemy has ever done; that is, to emasculate the United States Military. I honestly don't know how he could have done it more effectively. He's dangerously downsized the force; he's rooted out warriors like Stan McChrystal and Carter Ham from the General and Flag Officer ranks and installed puppets like George Casey and Martin Dempsey; he not only obliterated 'Don't ask, Don't tell'; he searched long and hard to find an openly gay (and utterly unqualified) man to be Sec Army; he opened not just combat arms to women, but the absolute tips of the spear in Infantry, Armor and Artillery, and the predictable result is directives like "balance lactation support and readiness?"
Sorry, I'm old school, but I THOUGHT READINESS WAS NEVER, EVER COMPROMISED… let alone for "lactation support".
You don't buy that? Tell you what – pick 50 men at random from anywhere and 50 women. Put 'em in a big ring and tell 'em to fight to the death. Have a problem immediately predicting the outcome? If you do, I can't help you. You're an idiot or a flaming liberal who believes that "Laura Croft, Tomb Raider" is real.
God help me, but am I the only one who sees through that bull? I guess the Rangers at Point du Hoc weren't good enough, huh Martin? Neither were the SEALS at Benghazi? I guess Delta's incredible successes are not sufficient. 'We must reassess the standards'. Total crock of ----. Scrape away the BS, and here's the residue: We're gonna lower the bar 'till the women can get over it, period. Think that'll have any effect on lethality? BTW, how'd you like to be the Ranger School Commandant who goes to Massa Dempsey's office to 'splain why women aint' makin' it? Think he might avoid that by "adjusting" things a bit?
But it all pales, in my humble world, to his destruction of the American Military. These are the guardians of our way of life. These are the warriors. These are the "rough MEN who allow us to sleep soundly, because they stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm". But go ahead, America: let this ideologue continue the systematic defanging of our fighting force. Let him feminize it. Let him drag it into the political correctness cesspool. Let him continue the social engineering and tinkering. Keep putting high heel shoes on male cadets, so they can "empathize". Forget all our hard-fought lessons at Khe Sanh, the Chosin Resevoir, Bastogne, Belleau Wood, Gettysburg, and Bunker Hill. Let the idiots tell you that war is "push button" now, so anyone can be a warrior.
Go ahead…
Historians won't have a difficult time analyzing this disintegration. We were just too timid to put a stop to the madness… "
| ||
|