Monday, August 26, 2019

I sometimes see stories I don't believe and then I see stories I don't WANT to believe

Fake buyers raiding medicine cabinets at open houses to steal opioids from home sellers
Aug. 26th, 2019

People are sneaking into open houses under realtors' noses and stealing home sellers' prescription opioids.

As the flood of opioids into vulnerable communities has grown, realtors have had to be on guard to prevent drug theft while hosting open houses, and to educate home sellers about their roles in prevention, including hiding their medications in the same way they would firearms.

Realtor associations across the country have taken on the unlikely role, in league with law enforcement and healthcare professionals, in working to prevent the spread of opioid abuse.

"We're seeing more of it, I think, and I'll speak from a Pennsylvania and a local level," Bill McFalls, Jr., president of the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors told the Washington Examiner. "I have seen it firsthand in a family. We do mail outs, seminars, to make [PAR members] aware of what's happening out there. It's occurring, and we go to great lengths to instruct members how to prevent against it."

Members are told to ID people arriving to open houses, as well as to keep a close watch on people in the homes, sometimes sending more than one agent to monitor the crowds.

The Pennsylvania Association of Realtors are advising not only their members, but also their sellers, about the problem and how to safeguard their medications during open houses.

McFalls said his association tells sellers that hiding pill bottles is not enough. Sellers are advised to lock their medications in a safe. The Delaware County Heroin Task Force is working with the national opioid abuse prevention group Lock Your Meds to encourage people nationwide that locking up opioids is a near fool-proof way to safeguard their medications.

Anjanette Frye, president of Ohio Realtors told the Washington Examiner her association is partnering with the Ohio Opioid Education Alliance.

Realtors encourage sellers to keep drugs away from rogue "buyers" by putting extra pills sellers will not need into bags provided by the realtor "that dissolve the drugs when they come in contact with water," Frye said. For example if a seller is prescribed a 30-day supply but they feel better after 15 days, they can put their pills in this bag, add water, and the pills' chemicals break down and the pills disintegrate. The process has "been pretty successful," Frye said.

"We've been working with the alliance since last year and will continue to work into 2020 and years to come," she said. "Ohio has a huge opioid crisis. This is part of the community building process."

Frye added that measures Ohio Realtors have taken alongside the Ohio Opioid Education Alliance have led to a noticeable decrease in reported instances of theft.

Realtors themselves have not been immune to the urge to raid medicine cabinets

"About three years ago we found that a former agent was stealing things in open houses," Eric Winklhofer, president of the Buffalo Niagara Association of Realtors, told the Washington Examiner. "She was actually arrested."

Saturday, August 24, 2019

El Paso Walmart

The audio is Spanish, so I can't be sure but it appears to be a woman shoplifter who has been asked to empty her pockets.

This could be a "that's impossible" act on America's Got Talent.

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

The best part of my day is checking the Babylon Bee😊

Six-Year-Old Saying, 'Why Don't We Just Give Everything Away For Free?' Surges To Top Of Democratic Polls

U.S.—A new candidate has come out of nowhere to surge in the polls in the Democratic primary, and she's only six years old. Susie Peters of Minneapolis, Minnesota, was on a local news segment where children gave their opinions on world problems, and she asked, "Why can't we just give everyone everything they want for free?" The message quickly went viral and really resonated with Democratic voters, propelling Susie from unknown to third in most polls, ahead of Bernie Sanders and just behind Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden.

"She really has a plan for everything," said Melinda Carlson, one of Susie's enthusiastic supporters. "While Elizabeth Warren only has a plan for getting people free health care and free college, Susie has a plan to get everyone free everything. She's truly a visionary."

Her new candidacy has upset some of the other candidates, with Bernie Sanders accusing Susie of stealing all his ideas. Others say the math in her plans doesn't add up, to which Susie says she doesn't like math and instead likes "Twilight Sparkle." And President Trump has taken notice, vowing to trounce Susie in the general since Trump himself can "read and write at the level of an eight-year-old." There are also concerns Susie may be gaffe-prone like Joe Biden, as one day at school Susie referred to her teacher as "Mommy" by mistake, prompting a round of laughter from her classmates.

Still, Susie has unveiled her new popular campaign slogan, "But I want it!" and has already qualified for the next Democratic presidential debate, though she may not be able to attend since it will be on past her bedtime.

Friday, August 9, 2019

Folks, the Babylon Bee is hilarious. Subscribe before the stop-free-speech Troika (Twitter, Facebook, Google) ban it

Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics

Ocasio-Cortez Severely Burned After Accidentally Touching Book On Basic Economics

NEW YORK, NY—Democratic candidate for Congress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was in the middle of a run-of-the-mill interview—blankly staring at the interviewer for a minute straight after being asked how she'd pay for all the social programs she's proposing—when disaster struck. She noticed a book on a table nearby and reached over to pick it up before anyone could stop her.

"Aieeee! It burns ussss!" Ocasio-Cortez screamed as her hand burst into flames from touching the book on rudimentary economic concepts. She claimed she had never seen one of those "dreadful things" before and wasn't aware how much damage it could do.

She was immediately rushed to the hospital.


As socialism has become increasingly popular, we've been seeing more and more of this," said Doctor Pauline Hudson, who treated Ocasio-Cortez for third-degree burns. "Often it's a severe-allergic reaction to math. Socialist policies are all well and good, but if you adopt them, you want to stay far away from even basic economic idea like supply and demand. It's not pretty what happens when the two collide."

Ocasio-Cortez is expected to make a full recovery and seems undaunted by the incident, already proposing even more programs she thinks the government should pay for, like dog-walking. In the future, she says she'll be more careful. Luckily, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to easily win her heavily Democratic district which means she's headed for our nation's Capitol, a place that's traditionally been a safe space from economics and math.

Thursday, August 8, 2019

Babylon Bee satire

Democrats Propose Creation Of National Trump Voter Registry

Democrats Propose Creation Of National Trump Voter Registry

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Congressional Democrats recently noticed a problem in our nation: many of the people who voted for Donald Trump have yet to be beaten up.

Our Democratic leaders in Washington decided it was time to solve this problem because they are really good at identifying problems we didn't even know we had and then solving them.

Presidential candidate Joaquin Castro, who spearheaded the program, explained, "The solution is simple and cost-effective: a national Trump Voter Registry, forcing anyone who voted for Trump to register so people around them will be able to be cautious and vigilant while living among such reckless hate."


Anyone who voted for Trump will have to sign up on the national registry's website. Then, their name and address will automatically appear on a map of the country so that their neighbors can avoid them and hopefully beat them up.

The bill also contains many other requirements for Trump voters:

  • They cannot live within 1,000 feet of a school, park, or civilized Democrat.
  • They must knock on all doors of other people in their neighborhood when they move in and identify themselves as a Trump voter.
  • They are required to wear their MAGA hats at all times so they can easily be identified as a legitimate target of harassment.
  • They must hire a crier to go before them and shout "SHAME! SHAME! SHAME!" whenever they go outside.
  • They are not allowed to get a job or conduct commerce unless they agree to get the Mark of Obama on their hand and forehead.

"With this new registry, we can finally have healing in our nation," said Nancy Pelosi. "Especially Trump voters. They'll have to have a lot of healing after they get punched in the face."

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

See... I told you to stay out of bars

Patron Urinated Into Nightclub's Ice Maker

AUGUST 5--A nightclub patron relieved himself into a commercial ice maker early Saturday, according to Florida police who arrested the intoxicated urinator for disorderly conduct.

Investigators say that Michael Williams, 28, was spotted "urinating inside the ice chest used to distribute ice throughout" 260 First, a St. Petersburg nightspot.

After relieving himself around 2:30 AM, Williams reportedly resisted as security guards sought to boot him from the club, where a "First Friday" party was winding down. The bash was advertised as "Trendy with a touch of class" and featured two DJs, including Spindiana Jones.

When police arrived at the nightspot, they arrested Williams on a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge. After a pat down turned up a bag of marijuana in Williams's pants pocket, cops tacked on a misdemeanor possession charge.

Seen above, Williams was booked into the county jail, from which he was released late Saturday morning after posting $400 bond.

Williams's rap sheet includes a felony marijuana conviction for which he was sentenced to 18 months probation. (1 page)

Monday, August 5, 2019

Here is a bit of rebuttal to the "Greenland is lost" demo-scare going around (focus on 12,500 years to lose HALF the ice)

wattsupwiththat.com

wattsupwiththat.com

Greenland Endures

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Charles the Moderator has been doing a fantastic job of keeping WUWT humming along, and deserves everyone's thanks. Today he sent me an interesting article thinking I might want to comment on it. It has the usual kind of alarmist headline, viz:

Greenland lost 11 billion tons of surface ice in one day

YIKES! EVERYONE PANIC!

Now, I've gotta admit that that sounds like a lot of ice, eleven billion with a "b" tonnes melted in one single day. However, I'm a tropical boy, so I'm kinda prejudiced in these matters. Here's my conflict of interest statement. When I'm in a place where the ice jumps up out of my adult beverage and starts running around the landscape, I consider that to be "water behaving badly" whether it's one cube or eleven billion tonnes, and I try to avoid such locations … but I digress.

To return to the question, is eleven billion tons of ice really a big number or not?

Well, to start with, it's a one-day loss in the warmest part of the year. Snow builds up on the ice sheet in the winter, and melts, sublimates, and is lost in icebergs in the summer. So this one-day loss tells us very little about the longer-term changes, what is called the "mass balance" of an ice sheet over an entire year or a longer period.

So what is happening in the longer term? A source for some information on this question is the Polar Portal. There's a good article to start with, the annual report for 2018. (It also has an interesting article on the various phenomena involved in the mass balance here.)

Let me start with a look at the mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet since 1972. Here's that data.

Figure 1. Annual mass balance showing the gain or loss of the total mass of the Greenland ice sheet.

From that data, we find that the 1981 – 2010 thirty-year average mass balance for the Greenland ice sheet was a net loss of 103 billion tonnes. Again, this is a very large number, it seems like a big deal that would demand our attention … but is it really?

In order to ask the question "How big is 103 billion tonnes?", we have to ask a related question:

"Compared to what?"

In this case, the answer is, "Compared to the total amount of ice on Greenland".

Here's one way of looking at that. We can ask, IF Greenland were to continue losing ice mass at a rate of 103 billion tonnes per year, how long would it take to melt say half of the ice sheet? Not all of it, mind you, but half of it. (Note that I am NOT saying that extending a current trend is a way to estimate the future evolution of the ice sheet—I'm merely using it as a way to compare large numbers.)

To answer our question if 103 billion tonnes lost per year is a big number, we have to compare the annual ice mass loss to the amount of ice in the Greenland ice sheet. The Greenland ice sheet contains about 2.6E+15 (2,600,000,000,000,000) tonnes of water in the form of snow and ice. 

So IF the Greenland ice sheet were to lose 103 billion tonnes per year into the indefinite future, it would take about twelve thousand five hundred years to lose half of it …

And even if the loss were to jump to ten times the long-term average, it would still take twelve hundred years to melt half the ice on the Greenland ice sheet. Even my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren won't live long enough to see that.

However … there has been no big trend in mass losses in Greenland. As you can see in the graph above, it went down starting in 1980 but has generally risen since about 2010 … go figure.

Let me close with another way to visualize the mass loss of the Greenland ice sheet using two graphs. The first graph shows the cumulative loss over the forty-six year period of the record. This is how it would commonly be shown.

Figure 2. Cumulative mass balance showing the cumulative gain or loss of the total mass of the Greenland ice sheet.

It's shown that way because, well, it looks pretty scary. It looks like the ice sheet is about to disappear.

By contrast, here's a more honest way to display the loss, by showing not the annual or cumulative anomalies, but instead showing the changes in the total mass of the Greenland ice sheet:

Figure 3. Changes in the total mass of the Greenland ice sheet.

Not as scary, huh?

As a result, I'd say that there's no need to worry about Greenland at this time. As Sanjeev Sabhlok recently wrote in a most reasonable article in the Times of India:

The best policy today is to (a) abandon socialism (Why does IPCC not talk about this ideology which is causing mankind the most harm?), and (b) to do everything possible to maximize the wealth of the current generations. Then review the [climate and energy] situation in 2050 when more data and new technologies become available. 

In the meanwhile, there's no harm in installing as many nuclear plants as are viable and growing more trees. And we can keep researching alternative energy technologies. However, interventions to divert precious resources into uneconomic solar and wind energy are the surest way to harm future generations. 

The climate change alarm movement is driven by extremist socialists. Ultra-socialist Saikat Chakrabarti, who prepared Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal, exposed the underbelly of climate change alarmism when he confessed that "The Green New Deal wasn't originally a climate thing at all. We think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing". The CO2 panic is a socialist harangue dressed in a veil of bad science. 

Can't say fairer than that …

Best to everyone, I've got to go outside now and get some work done ..

w.

PS. H/T Mona~ctm

 

Friday, August 2, 2019

Fun Friday

WORLD—Climate experts have solemnly warned that we only have twelve years left until they change the dates on global warming again.

"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again."

Hilarious full story here at the Babylon Bee